|
MKO 22nd LEGISLATIVE
GOVERNMENT HOUSE
Annual General Assembly Opaskwayak Cree Nation
September 9, 10, 11, 2003
Introduction
Tansi. I am
pleased to provide the MKO Chiefs in Assembly with an overview of
the activities and accomplishments with the Social Services Secretariat.
The staff of our unit include:
Louisa Constant,
BSW, Social Services Advisor
Jeanette Constant, Executive Assistant
Karen Anderson, BSW, MKO First Nations Family Secretariat Director
Charlene Cook, Administrative Assistant, MKO Family Secretariat
Laurel Gardiner, M.Ed., Building Sustainable Workforces Manager
Ramona Bighetty, Community Development Advisor
Jerry Knott, Community Development Advisor
The Social Services
program encompasses several inter-related and complementary initiatives
that are working together toward a vision of social programming
that reflects First Nation jurisdiction, rights and needs. The program
includes the following:
- Ongoing
advocacy on many policy and procedural matters with federal and
provincial social program administrators.
- Work on Child
and Family jurisdiction under the Framework Agreement Initiative
involving joint First Nations, Canada and Manitoba negotiations
on a draft Agreement in Principle on Child and Family Matters.
- Work on
developing First Nations administrative institutions, policies
and programs under the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry-Child Welfare
Initiative for provision of services to MKO First Nation citizens
off-reserve.
- The Building
Sustainable Workforces Initiative which focuses on community capacity
building that is working on the development of sustainable Nations
labour force strategy.
As well, over
the past year, the Social Services Advisor assumed senior management
responsibilities by assisting the Vice Chief/Interim Executive Director
in overseeing the day to day activities and operations of the MKO
Administration and Political offices. I am thankful to the Social
Services staff who also took on additional work over the past year
and assisted in meeting the objectives of our program while I was
on assignment in the Administration office. I will highlight the
activities that our unit has worked on over the past year.
ADVOCACY
A major focus
has been policy work on the renewal of federal Treasury Board Authorities
for INAC social programming through the Assembly of First Nations
Policy Advisory Group; lobbying INAC to change policies that negatively
impact our First Nations; and actively participating in government
initiatives that will shape and develop appropriate policies and
programs for MKO First Nations.
1. INAC Social
Programs Treasury Board Authorities
A review of
Treasury Board authorities for INAC's social programs took place
over the past year. The review encompassed INAC programs for social
assistance, child and family services, family violence, adult care
and national child benefit reinvestment. The treasury board authorities
for INAC's social program expired March 31, 2003.
MKO ensured
that First Nations were involved in this process because we were
concerned that the renewal of authorities had potential major impacts
on First Nations. INAC had identified "anomolies" in social program
funding arrangements in Manitoba. For example, there are no treasury
board authorities for funding of advisory services at the Tribal
Council level, and according to INAC there is no treasury board
authority to fund agencies' legal costs from the Child and Family
Services "child maintenance" budget. It was also our view that the
authorities renewal process will also impact on future initiatives
where INAC is a participant, such as the province's Cabinet mandated
steering committee review of northern food prices.
We were active
over the past year in the national effort to see that First Nation
needs are addressed. New Authorities are now in place, effective
this new fiscal year starting April 2003 and we continued to be
involved, through the Assembly of First Nations Policy Advisory
Group, in addressing the terms and conditions of funding agreements
through continued negotiation and lobbying.
In the upcoming
year, First Nations will have an opportunity to provide input on
two issues with regard to INAC's March 2004 Cabinet submission on
the practical, legal and cost implications of social services delivered
to all residents on-reserve and on the basis of "reasonable comparable"
to provincial services. The new social program Authorities were
revised to promote "on-reserve residency based service delivery"
and "reasonably comparable" to provincial social services.
This work will
begin in September 2003 with the involvement of the PTOs, Tribal
Councils, Child and Family Services Agencies and First Nations Education
Directors and through further discussions at the Assembly of First
Nations Policy Advisory Group. MKO will continue to be directly
involved in these discussions to ensure that MKO First Nations needs
are addressed.
2. INAC Tenant
Profile Form - MKO Resolution #2002-09-14
Effective April
1, 2002 INAC imposed a tenant profile form on First Nations in Manitoba
which required all social assistance recipients to disclose information
on all persons in their households. MKO First Nations were concerned
that the personal information required by INAC exceeded the information
necessary for INAC's purposes and objected to the tenant profile
form on the basis that it violated privacy laws. It was the view
of First Nations that INAC was forcing social assistance recipients
to disclose personal information about other tenants living in the
same households in our communities, possibly without their knowledge
and/or consent.
In response
to the concerns of First Nations, INAC forwarded a letter to First
Nations on August 9, 2002 stating that INAC was using the Tenant
Profile Form to gather information necessary to rationalize changes
to shelter related costs, such as rent, hydro, wood and utilities.
Furthermore, INAC also requested that the First Nations complete
and submit the forms by August 30, 2002 and advised that the First
Nations that do not provide this documentation may see reduced funding
and that those First Nations who chose not to send the requested
information will not be reimbursed for shelter related expenses.
During the MKO
Annual Assembly in September 2002 the Chiefs passed a resolution
rejecting the efforts of INAC to impose the Tenant Profile Form
and directed INAC to work collaboratively with MKO to develop a
mutually satisfactory resolution to the issue of data collection
and analysis in the Social Development Program. Further, the MKO
Chiefs directed the Grand Chief to pursue this matter further with
the Federal Privacy Commission and INAC Minister.
Acting on the
Chiefs' directive, in October 2002, the MKO Grand Chief led senior
level meetings with INAC to address the issues affecting MKO First
Nation with regard to the tenant profile form. A joint INAC and
First Nations technical working committee was established during
these meetings mandated to finding a mutually agreed upon alternative
to the INAC Tenant Profile Form. The joint working committee reached
an agreement in January 2003 as follows: Data collected by the First
Nations Social Assistant staff will be kept confidential at the
First Nations level. First Nations are to report numbers only to
INAC. The First Nations retain ownership and control of the data
collected. INAC is allowed to verify the information by phone, fax,
e-mail, or preliminary on site "spot check" reviews and in regular
compliance reviews. It was agreed that this data collection process
would come into effect within the current fiscal year.
Also, in October
2002 Grand Chief and INAC agreed to refer this matter to the Federal
Privacy Commission. Through the Public Interest Law Centre in Winnipeg,
AMC sought guidance from the federal Privacy Commission regarding
the following: Are First Nations social assistance administrators
allowed to gather personal information regarding individuals living
in the home but who are not on social assistance? If so, can they
disclose this information to INAC? A letter was forwarded to the
Privacy Commission in January 2003. The Privacy Commissioner responded
in March 2003 by stating that INAC technically is not in violation
of the Privacy Act, and that INAC has the legal right to gather
such information on the grounds that the information is being used
for administrative purposes. However, the Privacy Commissioner also
stated that INAC has to obtain the consent of the other tenants
so that the concerns raised by First Nations are addressed.
Following the
response from the federal Privacy Commission, INAC called for further
meetings with First Nations in May 2003. INAC confirmed that the
joint agreed upon data collection process would be implemented.
On July 28, 2003, INAC sent a letter to First Nations confirming
the mutually agreed upon data collection process which is to replace
the tenant profile form effective immediately in the 2003-04 fiscal
year. Furthermore, INAC advised First Nations that the shelter and
shelter related sections in the Social Assistance Program Manual
were revised.
Despite opposition
from our leadership, INAC continues to unilaterally impose policies
that negatively impact on our communities, such as the Tenant Profile
Form. The unilateral imposed policies often create further problems
for MKO First Nations and affect their rights. Therefore, it is
essential that we press INAC to involve First Nations in all policy
change that occurs. MKO will continue to pursue opportunities to
participate in policy design, development and decision making.
3. Northern
Food Prices Project Report In July 2002, a Manitoba Cabinet Committee
established a Northern Food Prices Project and mandated a steering
committee (consisting of provincial, federal and First Nations representatives)
to identify strategic options to address the concern about high
food prices in Northern Manitoba. More specifically, the purpose
of the project was for the steering committee to identify strategic
options that could reduce the retail prices of nutritious foods
to northern citizens, such as milk, milk products, fresh fruits,
vegetables, meats, whole grains and staples.
The steering
committee completed the project and submitted a report to the Healthy
Child Cabinet Committee in December 2002. The report "Northern Food
Prices Project" (Final draft, dated December 20, 2002) provides
the Cabinet Committee with an information base from which the solutions
to the high cost of nutritious foods can be pursued.
MKO representatives
on the steering committee consisted of Jim Beardy, KTC; Laurel Gardiner,
MKO; and Louisa Constant, MKO.
Seven priority
strategic options related to the nutritional health and food security
of Northerners were recommended by the steering committee in the
report, which if implemented have the potential for the greatest
impact on northern nutritious food prices. An eighth strategic option
related to a food rebate/subsidy was also recommended for further
study.
The strategic
options identified are as follows:
Northern
Food Self Sufficiency Initiative
This option
provides a comprehensive framework for a 5 year period that builds
local food provision activity and capacity in the north. As food
is produced, harvested and/or processed locally, the cost of food
may be reduced by replacing the "imported" product with a local
food supply.
The components
of this option include: gathering research and information about
producing food in the north; develop best practices guidelines for
producing food; delivery of a series of conferences, workshops and
community sharing sessions over a period of 5 years focused on building
community capacity for food self sufficiency; and the identification
and outline details for a new program on food self sufficiency as
determined by community input and participation.
Milk Price
Review in Northern Communities
This option
applies to the current Milk Price Review program in Manitoba which
recommends a broadening of the Milk Review Commission's mandate
to include 2 and 4 litre fluid milk, UHT tetra brick milk, canned
milk and lactose reduced milk products, in addition to the current
1 litre fluid milk. The additional milk product pricing will require
legislative and regulatory changes as well as extensive northern
food market systems research and the development of new pricing
formulas.
Northern
Food Business Development
This option
focuses on existing business and community development program,
funds and services and it encourages existing program to facilitate
the development, financing and support of northern food businesses
and activity.
Northern
Community Foods Program
This option
builds on the cultural tradition of sharing abundance with others
and it recommends the facilitation of sharing successful community
models of community food programs. These could include organized
hunting, fishing or gathering, community food distribution, food
preservation and cultural education about using traditional foods.
Northern
Greenhouse Pilot Project
This option
focuses on the production of local vegetables and fruits. The pilot
project will identify the types of greenhouse technology or other
innovative technology, such as the use of abandoned mines to grow
vegetables and fruit. The pilot will develop best practices for
greenhouse-type production in the north and use 2-3 pilot projects
to test the success of these systems, production practices and training
needed.
Northern
Gardens Initiatives
This option
calls for the facilitation and support for northern gardening activity.
The form of gardening (individual, community, commercial, market,
school or youth based) will be determined by community identified
need.
Northern
Food Price Survey Program
This option
builds on and uses existing resources to coordinate the regular
collection, analysis and dissemination of northern food prices.
This information complements all other actions that might be taken
to resolve the problem of high food prices. As well, it was viewed
that regular food price surveys can contribute to an evaluation
of success of other options that may be implemented and it will
provide a monitoring function of food prices over time.
For further
study and review: Food Cost Rebate Option
This option
is discussed in the report and brought forward by the steering committee
for consideration, should governments provide a direct subsidy to
the high cost of food for those who live in communities with the
highest retail prices for nutritious foods. It recommends potential
food subsidy ideas such as a nutritious food subsidy, that governments
may consider.
No significant
decision has been made by the Healthy Child Cabinet Committee, on
behalf of the provincial government as to which, if any, of the
strategic options will be implemented. The province recently identified
$50,000 funding for a pilot project in Red Sucker Lake First Nation.
On August 25,
2003 MKO met with Manitoba's Aboriginal and Northern Affairs Minister
to push for implementation on the prioritized options and we were
informed that a Cabinet submission has been tabled and that we can
expect a commitment on four of the options within the next few months.
CHILD AND
FAMILY JURISDICTION NEGOTIATIONS
MKO is leading
Framework Agreement Initiative (FAI) negotiations on a draft Agreement
in Principle (AIP) with the federal government to set parameters
and understandings for the restoration of First Nations jurisdiction
in the area of child and family matters. We are targeting March
2004 for completing a draft AIP. The FAI agreement itself will be
up for renewal in 2004.
Difficult issues
remain to be addressed. Federal positions on application of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, aggregation and delegation,
legal status and capacity, are unacceptable. Representatives from
Manitoba are also at the child and family table but they do not
have a mandate from the Manitoba Cabinet to negotiate positions
at the table. At this time, Manitoba is at the table in support
of the federal position on provincial participation.
ABORIGINAL
JUSTICE INQUIRY - CHILD WELFARE INITIATIVE
Work continues
on under the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry-Child Welfare Initiative
with Manitoba to develop MKO First Nations administrative capacity
and authorities to provide child and family services to all First
Nations citizens throughout the province. MKO, in conjunction with
the northern First Nations Child and Family Services Agencies, have
established a Northern First Nations Child and Family Services Authority
accountable to the MKO First Nations. A Chief Executive Officer,
Ms. Diane Kematch of Sapotaweyak Cree Nation; a Chief Financial
Officer, Ms. Cheryl Freeman; Legal Counsel, Ms. Kaye Dunlop; and
policy staff, Colin Kinsella; were hired. Work is still underway
on a comprehensive framework for planning and implementing the new
Child and Family Services system and the Northern Authority staff
are working with the five northern agencies to design optimal service
delivery.
New provincial
legislation to create and recognize our Northern CFS Authority was
passed in the Manitoba Legislature. Proclamation on the new Authorities
is expected to take place as early as October 2003. We face a tight
time frame and a complex undertaking.
BUILDING SUSTAINABLE
WORKFORCES INITIATIVE Successful capacity development, partnership
building, training and cross sectoral team development by the Building
Sustainable Workforces initiative will continue to support community
development in our communities. MKO continues to establish partnerships
with governments, corporations, First Nations, Education Institutions,
Employers, Tribal Council Investment Groups, to develop sustainable
workforces in First Nations. A partnership declaration signing ceremony
will take place during the Annual General Assembly. We believe the
investment made by interested groups, through the partnership, will
lead to increasing self reliance in First Nations communities, and
in the long run, raise the social and economic standard of living.
As part of the
INAC Social Program Treasury Board Review, the "Gathering Strength"
policy authorities were also under review ($23M in the Region during
the period of 1998-2003). The MKO Building Sustainable Workforces
initiative was funded under the Gathering Strength allocations.
The continuation of the MKO Building Sustainable Workforces initiative
will be determined in the Authorities and program terms and conditions
review process. MKO has proposed a renewed and continuing focus
on access to employment, resources and investment. In the interim
we have managed to secure commitment to maintaining the momentum
we have achieved with the Building Sustainable Workforce Initiative.
CONCLUSION
We have worked
diligently over the past year to ensure the needs of MKO First Nations
are addressed. We will strive for good progress in the coming year
and we will continue to be diligent in our work on the restoration
of First Nations jurisdiction, rights and needs.
|